Clicky

Kodak M341 vs Olympus E-620

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare M341 front
 
Olympus E-620 front
Portability
71
Imaging
47
Features
50
Overall
48

Kodak M341 vs Olympus E-620 Key Specs

Kodak M341
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 135g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Announced July 2009
Olympus E-620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
  • Released July 2009
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

Kodak M341 vs Olympus E-620 Overview

Here, we are reviewing the Kodak M341 versus Olympus E-620, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the M341 (12MP) and the E-620 (12MP) is very comparable but the M341 (1/2.3") and E-620 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor size.

Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming

The M341 was announced very close to the E-620 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Kodak M341 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-620 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summary of how the M341 scores vs the E-620 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M341 over the Olympus E-620

 M341 E-620 
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Kodak M341

 E-620 M341 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Kodak M341 and Olympus E-620

 M341 E-620 
ReleasedJuly 2009July 2009Same age
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Kodak M341 vs Olympus E-620 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak M341 provides external measurements of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus E-620 has proportions of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak M341 versus Olympus E-620 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the M341 compared to the E-620.

Kodak M341 vs Olympus E-620 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the M341 and E-620 is 96 and 71 respectively.

Kodak M341 vs Olympus E-620 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M341 vs Olympus E-620 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the M341 and E-620.

As you can see, each of these cameras feature the identical MP but not the same sensor sizing. The M341 offers the smaller sensor which should make achieving shallow depth of field trickier.

Kodak M341 vs Olympus E-620 sensor size comparison

Kodak M341 vs Olympus E-620 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M341 vs Olympus E-620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M341 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-620 as a Portrait photography camera
21
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
60
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Street Comparison

Kodak M341 Street photography details
Olympus E-620 Street photography details
48
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
76
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak M341
Sports photography with Olympus E-620
17
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
48
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
slow frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
terrible battery pack (500 per charge)
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Travel Comparison

Kodak M341 Travel photography highlights
Olympus E-620 Travel photography highlights
52
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse function
megapixel count low (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
53
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
no Time Lapse function
terrible battery pack (500 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M341 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-620 Landscape photography highlights
28
good sized screen (3 inches)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
53
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7")
low megapixels (12MP)
terrible battery pack (500 CIPA)
no Time Lapse function
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M341 Vlogging details
Olympus E-620 Vlogging details
22
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone jack
18
can't shoot video
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Kodak M341 vs Olympus E-620 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M341 and Olympus E-620
 Kodak EasyShare M341Olympus E-620
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare M341 Olympus E-620
Type Ultracompact Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2009-07-29 2009-07-06
Physical type Ultracompact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 7
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 35-175mm (5.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.0-4.8 -
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Number of lenses - 45
Focal length multiplier 5.9 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - HyperCrystal LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.48x
Features
Min shutter speed 8 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.20 m 12.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 135 grams (0.30 pounds) 500 grams (1.10 pounds)
Physical dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 55
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.3
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.3
DXO Low light score not tested 536
Other
Battery life - 500 shots
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7003 BLS-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots One One
Retail cost $130 $799