Clicky

Kodak M341 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare M341 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Kodak M341 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Kodak M341
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 135g - 96 x 59 x 19mm
  • Released July 2009
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Photography Glossary

Kodak M341 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Here is a in-depth assessment of the Kodak M341 versus Samsung WB350F, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There is a big difference among the image resolutions of the M341 (12MP) and WB350F (16MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The M341 was revealed 5 years before the WB350F and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Kodak M341 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the M341 matches up against the WB350F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M341 over the Samsung WB350F

 M341 WB350F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Kodak M341

 WB350F M341 
IntroducedJanuary 2014July 2009Fresher by 54 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Kodak M341 and Samsung WB350F

 M341 WB350F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Kodak M341 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak M341 features outer dimensions of 96mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Examine the Kodak M341 versus Samsung WB350F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the M341 against the WB350F.

Kodak M341 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the M341 and WB350F is 96 and 90 respectively.

Kodak M341 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Kodak M341 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Often, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the M341 and WB350F.

Clearly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Samsung WB350F to provide you with more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images much more aggressively. The older M341 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak M341 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Kodak M341 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M341 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M341 Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography factors
21
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
40
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak M341 Street photography factors
Samsung WB350F Street photography factors
48
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (276 grams)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Kodak M341 Sports photography details
Samsung WB350F Sports photography details
17
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
50
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Kodak M341 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Travel photography camera
52
flash built-in
no Time Lapse function
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
69
lighter than competitors in class (276 grams)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M341 Landscape photography factors
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography factors
28
nice screen size (3 inches)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Time Lapse function
50
manual focus
reasonably wide (23mm)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak M341
Vlogging with Samsung WB350F
22
wide angle not the best (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pxls)
no external mic socket
34
reasonably wide (23mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (276 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M341 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M341 and Samsung WB350F
 Kodak EasyShare M341Samsung WB350F
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Samsung
Model Kodak EasyShare M341 Samsung WB350F
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-07-29 2014-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-175mm (5.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.0-4.8 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus range 10cm -
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 16 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.20 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 135 gr (0.30 lbs) 276 gr (0.61 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 59 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7003 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) -
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $130 $260