Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-310
95 Imaging
33 Features
13 Overall
25
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-310, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Kodak and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the M380 (10MP) and TG-310 (14MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M380 was announced 24 months prior to the TG-310 making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Kodak M380 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick overview of how the M380 scores versus the TG-310 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M380 and Olympus TG-310. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak M380 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Olympus TG-310
| M380 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Kodak M380
| TG-310 | M380 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 24 months |
Common features in the Kodak M380 and Olympus TG-310
| M380 | TG-310 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M380 provides exterior dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-310 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the M380 and the TG-310.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M380 and TG-310 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by looking at specifications. The image underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M380 and TG-310.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-310 to give greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged M380 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Kodak M380 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M380 | Olympus TG-310 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M380 | Olympus TG-310 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 38-190mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1448 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.50 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 155 grams (0.34 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7003 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $160 | $0 |
