Clicky

Kodak M380 vs Sony A230

Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
13
Overall
25
Kodak EasyShare M380 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A230 front
Portability
69
Imaging
50
Features
40
Overall
46

Kodak M380 vs Sony A230 Key Specs

Kodak M380
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
  • Launched January 2009
Sony A230
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 490g - 128 x 97 x 68mm
  • Revealed May 2009
  • Previous Model is Sony A200
  • Updated by Sony A290
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak M380 vs Sony A230 Overview

In this write-up, we are contrasting the Kodak M380 and Sony A230, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. The image resolution of the M380 (10MP) and the A230 (10MP) is fairly similar but the M380 (1/2.3") and A230 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The M380 was launched 4 months before the A230 and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras offer different body type with the Kodak M380 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A230 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the M380 matches up vs the A230 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Sony A230

 M380 A230 
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Sony A230 over the Kodak M380

 A230 M380 
Manual focus Very exact focusing

Common features in the Kodak M380 and Sony A230

 M380 A230 
RevealedJanuary 2009May 2009Similar generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Kodak M380 vs Sony A230 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M380 comes with outer dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony A230 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7") having a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs).

Check the Kodak M380 and Sony A230 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the M380 vs the A230.

Kodak M380 vs Sony A230 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the M380 and A230 is 95 and 69 respectively.

Kodak M380 vs Sony A230 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M380 vs Sony A230 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading a spec sheet. The pic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the M380 and A230.

Clearly, both cameras offer the same exact MP but not the same sensor dimensions. The M380 contains the tinier sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF tougher.

Kodak M380 vs Sony A230 sensor size comparison

Kodak M380 vs Sony A230 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M380 vs Sony A230 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M380 Portrait photography highlights
Sony A230 Portrait photography highlights
19
manual focus not available
no manual control
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
54
manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
does not have liveview
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Kodak M380 Street photography details
Sony A230 Street photography details
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than average (155g)
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no moving screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Kodak M380 Sports photography advice
Sony A230 Sports photography advice
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,448s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
46
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with phase detect auto focus
does not have liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
terrible battery life (230 shots)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Kodak M380 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A230 as a Travel photography camera
50
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than average (155g)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
45
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse function
terrible battery life (230 per charge)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M380 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A230 as a Landscape photography camera
27
screen size is decent (3 inches)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
51
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7")
does not have liveview
resolution not great (10MP)
terrible battery life (230 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M380 Vlogging information
Sony A230 Vlogging information
22
wide angle not great (38mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have mic jack
heavier than average (155 grams)
9
can't record video
Photography Glossary

Kodak M380 vs Sony A230 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M380 and Sony A230
 Kodak EasyShare M380Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Sony
Model type Kodak EasyShare M380 Sony Alpha DSLR-A230
Category Ultracompact Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2009-01-08 2009-05-18
Physical type Ultracompact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 3872 x 2592
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 25 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 38-190mm (5.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.6 -
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Available lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1448s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 2.50 m 10.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 155g (0.34 lb) 490g (1.08 lb)
Dimensions 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") 128 x 97 x 68mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 63
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 531
Other
Battery life - 230 pictures
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID KLIC-7003 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots Single Single
Price at release $160 $569