Clicky

Kodak M381 vs Ricoh GR II

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare M381 front
 
Ricoh GR II front
Portability
89
Imaging
59
Features
55
Overall
57

Kodak M381 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs

Kodak M381
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
  • Introduced July 2009
Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Released June 2015
  • Previous Model is Ricoh GR
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak M381 vs Ricoh GR II Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Kodak M381 vs Ricoh GR II, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the M381 (12MP) and GR II (16MP) and the M381 (1/2.3") and GR II (APS-C) use different sensor size.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The M381 was launched 6 years earlier than the GR II which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak M381 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the M381 matches up versus the GR II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Ricoh GR II

 M381 GR II 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Kodak M381

 GR II M381 
ReleasedJune 2015July 2009Newer by 71 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen resolution1230k230kClearer screen (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Kodak M381 and Ricoh GR II

 M381 GR II 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Kodak M381 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Kodak M381 comes with outside dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GR II has sizing of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak M381 vs Ricoh GR II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the M381 and the GR II.

Kodak M381 vs Ricoh GR II size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M381 and GR II is 95 and 89 respectively.

Kodak M381 vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison

Kodak M381 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specifications. The picture below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M381 and GR II.

Plainly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M381 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh GR II will offer greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged M381 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak M381 vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison

Kodak M381 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M381 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M381 Portrait photography details
Ricoh GR II Portrait photography details
21
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
75
focusing manually
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detection focus
supports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Kodak M381 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GR II as a Street photography camera
47
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (153g)
74
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
lighter than competition (251g)
very good ISO range (25,600)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Kodak M381 Sports photography factors
Ricoh GR II Sports photography factors
17
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
50
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
focal length is fixed (28mm)
low frames per second (4.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Kodak M381 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GR II as a Travel photography camera
50
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (153 grams)
megapixel count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
67
lighter than competition (251 grams)
MP count good (16MP)
built-in flash
no Timelapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M381
Landscape photography with Ricoh GR II
28
screen size is decent (3 inches)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
59
focusing manually
good sized screen (3 inch)
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have image stabilization
no Timelapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M381 Vlogging information
Ricoh GR II Vlogging information
22
wide angle not great (35mm)
slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (153g)
32
comes with face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (251g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
no external microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M381 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M381 and Ricoh GR II
 Kodak EasyShare M381Ricoh GR II
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Ricoh
Model Kodak EasyShare M381 Ricoh GR II
Category Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-07-29 2015-06-17
Body design Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - GR Engine V
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 4928 x 3264
Max native ISO 1600 25600
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 35-175mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.0-4.8 f/2.8-16.0
Macro focus range 10cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Min shutter speed 8s 300s
Max shutter speed 1/1400s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.20 m 3.00 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 153 gr (0.34 lb) 251 gr (0.55 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 80
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1078
Other
Battery life - 320 shots
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7003 DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at release $170 $599