Clicky

Kodak M381 vs Samsung WB250F

Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare M381 front
 
Samsung WB250F front
Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
44
Overall
40

Kodak M381 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs

Kodak M381
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
  • Launched July 2009
Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak M381 vs Samsung WB250F Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Kodak M381 versus Samsung WB250F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Kodak and Samsung. The image resolution of the M381 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

The M381 was manufactured 4 years before the WB250F and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Kodak M381 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the M381 grades vs the WB250F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Samsung WB250F

 M381 WB250F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Kodak M381

 WB250F M381 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013July 2009More recent by 41 months
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak M381 and Samsung WB250F

 M381 WB250F 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Kodak M381 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak M381 provides outer dimensions of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

See the Kodak M381 versus Samsung WB250F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the M381 compared to the WB250F.

Kodak M381 vs Samsung WB250F size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the M381 and WB250F is 95 and 93 respectively.

Kodak M381 vs Samsung WB250F top view buttons comparison

Kodak M381 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements purely by going through specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M381 and WB250F.

Plainly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB250F to show extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older M381 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak M381 vs Samsung WB250F sensor size comparison

Kodak M381 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M381 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M381 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB250F as a Portrait photography camera
21
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
36
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
features face detection focus
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Kodak M381 Street photography info
Samsung WB250F Street photography info
47
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
more heavy than others (153 grams)
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than average (226g)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Kodak M381 Sports photography factors
Samsung WB250F Sports photography factors
17
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400 seconds)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
52
incredible zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Kodak M381 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung WB250F as a Travel photography camera
50
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than others (153 grams)
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
69
lighter than average (226 grams)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (24mm)
long reach (432mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M381 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB250F as a Landscape photography camera
28
screen is a good size (3 inch)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
44
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
lack of manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M381 Vlogging info
Samsung WB250F Vlogging info
22
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external microphone jack
more heavy than others (153 grams)
35
rather wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than average (226 grams)
slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
Photography Glossary

Kodak M381 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M381 and Samsung WB250F
 Kodak EasyShare M381Samsung WB250F
General Information
Company Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak EasyShare M381 Samsung WB250F
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2009-07-29 2013-01-07
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 4320 x 3240
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-175mm (5.0x) 24-432mm (18.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.0-4.8 f/3.2-5.8
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8s 16s
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed - 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.20 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 153 gr (0.34 lb) 226 gr (0.50 lb)
Physical dimensions 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID KLIC-7003 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $170 $250