Kodak M530 vs Olympus E-300
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
Kodak M530 vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F) lens
- 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-330
Kodak M530 vs Olympus E-300 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Kodak M530 and Olympus E-300, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Kodak and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the M530 (12MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the M530 (1/2.3") and E-300 (Four Thirds) provide different sensor measurements.
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's DominanceThe M530 was manufactured 5 years after the E-300 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Kodak M530 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the M530 matches up versus the E-300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak M530 vs Olympus E-300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare M530 & Olympus E-300. The entire galleries are provided at Kodak M530 Gallery & Olympus E-300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Olympus E-300
M530 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | January 2005 | Newer by 61 months | |
Display size | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer display (+96k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Kodak M530
E-300 | M530 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing |
Common features in the Kodak M530 and Olympus E-300
M530 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Kodak M530 vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak M530 provides physical measurements of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) while the Olympus E-300 has measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M530 and Olympus E-300 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the M530 against the E-300.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the M530 and E-300 is 95 and 67 respectively.
Kodak M530 vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The image here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the M530 and E-300.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M530 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Kodak M530 will give more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics way more aggressively. The fresher M530 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak M530 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M530 vs Olympus E-300 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M530 | Olympus E-300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M530 | Olympus E-300 |
Also Known as | - | EVOLT E-300 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2010-01-05 | 2005-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3264 x 2448 |
Max native ISO | 1000 | 400 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | - |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 45 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 1.8 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 134 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/8s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 150g (0.33 pounds) | 624g (1.38 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $110 | $800 |