Kodak M530 vs Sony HX300
95 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
63 Imaging
45 Features
51 Overall
47
Kodak M530 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-108mm (F) lens
- 150g - 94 x 57 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
- Launched February 2013
- Older Model is Sony HX200V
- Successor is Sony HX400V
Kodak M530 vs Sony HX300 Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Kodak M530 versus Sony HX300, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the M530 (12MP) and HX300 (20MP) but they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M530 was launched 4 years prior to the HX300 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak M530 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the M530 grades vs the HX300 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Kodak M530 vs Sony HX300 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare M530 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300. The complete galleries are available at Kodak M530 Gallery & Sony HX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M530 over the Sony HX300
M530 | HX300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Kodak M530
HX300 | M530 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2013 | January 2010 | Fresher by 38 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak M530 and Sony HX300
M530 | HX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Kodak M530 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Kodak M530 has got outside measurements of 94mm x 57mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Sony HX300 has specifications of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Kodak M530 versus Sony HX300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the M530 vs the HX300.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the M530 and HX300 is 95 and 63 respectively.
Kodak M530 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the M530 and HX300.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Sony HX300 to give greater detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older M530 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak M530 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M530 vs Sony HX300 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M530 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Sony |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M530 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2013-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 1000 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-108mm (3.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/8s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 150g (0.33 lb) | 623g (1.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 94 x 57 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $110 | $339 |