Kodak M575 vs Nikon S9900
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
88 Imaging
41 Features
60 Overall
48
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Launched February 2015
- Superseded the Nikon S9700
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak M575 vs Nikon S9900 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Kodak M575 vs Nikon S9900, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Kodak and Nikon. The resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the S9900 (16MP) is fairly similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe M575 was announced 6 years before the S9900 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Kodak M575 being a Ultracompact camera and the Nikon S9900 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the M575 grades vs the S9900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Kodak M575 vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M575 & Nikon Coolpix S9900. The whole galleries are viewable at Kodak M575 Gallery & Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Nikon S9900
| M575 | S9900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Kodak M575
| S9900 | M575 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 62 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Kodak M575 and Nikon S9900
| M575 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display size |
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Kodak M575 offers outside dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Nikon S9900 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Check the Kodak M575 vs Nikon S9900 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the M575 versus the S9900.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the M575 and S9900 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing specs. The visual here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M575 and S9900.
All in all, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Nikon S9900 to deliver extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older M575 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak M575 vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare M575 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Kodak | Nikon |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare M575 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-01-05 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1000 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.7-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 289 gr (0.64 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | KLIC-7006 | EN-EL19 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $139 | $300 |
