Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh PX

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Ricoh PX front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Introduced August 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh PX Overview

The following is a complete overview of the Kodak M575 versus Ricoh PX, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Kodak and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the PX (16MP) is pretty close and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M575 was launched 19 months earlier than the PX which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Kodak M575 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.

Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summation of how the M575 scores against the PX in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Ricoh PX

 M575 PX 
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Kodak M575

 PX M575 
IntroducedAugust 2011January 2010Newer by 19 months
Manual focus Dial precise focusing

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Ricoh PX

 M575 PX 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 offers outside measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh PX has proportions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

Take a look at the Kodak M575 versus Ricoh PX in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the M575 against the PX.

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh PX size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and PX is 95 and 95 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through specs. The pic underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the M575 and PX.

All in all, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh PX to render more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged M575 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 Portrait photography features
Ricoh PX Portrait photography features
28
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
43
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
comes with face detection autofocus
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 Street photography information
Ricoh PX Street photography information
48
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
more heavy than competition in class (152 grams)
max ISO too low (1,000)
63
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh PX as a Sports photography camera
26
megapixel count decent (14MP)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proofing
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography details
Ricoh PX Travel photography details
68
megapixel count decent (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (152 grams)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
68
weather proofing
megapixel count good (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.9)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Kodak M575
Landscape photography with Ricoh PX
40
pretty wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
no RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse mode
47
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
weather proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7")
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 Vlogging information
Ricoh PX Vlogging information
28
pretty wide (28mm)
fast max aperture (f)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone socket
more heavy than competition in class (152 grams)
31
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic port
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh PX Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Ricoh PX
 Kodak EasyShare M575Ricoh PX
General Information
Brand Kodak Ricoh
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Ricoh PX
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2010-01-05 2011-08-16
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3072
Highest native ISO 1000 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.9-5.4
Macro focus range 10cm 3cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 8 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152g (0.34 lbs) 156g (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at release $139 $329