Clicky

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh WG-50

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
24
Overall
31
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
 
Ricoh WG-50 front
Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs

Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released January 2010
Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Launched May 2017
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview

Here is a detailed assessment of the Kodak M575 and Ricoh WG-50, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Ricoh. The image resolution of the M575 (14MP) and the WG-50 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The M575 was launched 8 years earlier than the WG-50 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Kodak M575 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the M575 grades vs the WG-50 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Ricoh WG-50

 M575 WG-50 
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Kodak M575

 WG-50 M575 
LaunchedMay 2017January 2010Fresher by 89 months
Focus manually Very accurate focusing

Common features in the Kodak M575 and Ricoh WG-50

 M575 WG-50 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Kodak M575 has got outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Look at the Kodak M575 and Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the M575 and the WG-50.

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and WG-50 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M575 and WG-50.

To sum up, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-50 to show greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older M575 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-50 as a Portrait photography camera
28
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
42
manual focus
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Kodak M575 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh WG-50 as a Street photography camera
48
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
maximum ISO low (1,000)
62
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather proof
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Kodak M575 Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-50 Sports photography factors
26
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
49
has image stabilization (Digital)
resolution is good (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proof
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Kodak M575 Travel photography info
Ricoh WG-50 Travel photography info
68
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
71
weather proof
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M575 Landscape photography information
Ricoh WG-50 Landscape photography information
40
rather wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3")
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
maximum ISO low (1,000)
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse function
48
manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
resolution is good (16MP)
weather proof
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M575 Vlogging information
Ricoh WG-50 Vlogging information
28
rather wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external mic jack
heavier than competition in class (152 grams)
33
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of external microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak M575 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M575 and Ricoh WG-50
 Kodak EasyShare M575Ricoh WG-50
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Ricoh
Model Kodak EasyShare M575 Ricoh WG-50
Type Ultracompact Waterproof
Released 2010-01-05 2017-05-24
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1000 6400
Lowest native ISO 80 125
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus distance 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/1400s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.50 m 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off On, off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 gr (0.34 lbs) 193 gr (0.43 lbs)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 pictures
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7006 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots One One
Retail price $139 $280