Kodak M575 vs Sony A6400
95 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
83 Imaging
70 Features
88 Overall
77
Kodak M575 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Launched January 2019
Kodak M575 vs Sony A6400 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Kodak M575 versus Sony A6400, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Kodak and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the M575 (14MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the M575 (1/2.3") and A6400 (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsAppThe M575 was launched 10 years prior to the A6400 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak M575 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the M575 matches up vs the A6400 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Kodak M575 vs Sony A6400 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare M575 and Sony Alpha a6400. The complete galleries are provided at Kodak M575 Gallery and Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Sony A6400
M575 | A6400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Kodak M575
A6400 | M575 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2019 | January 2010 | More modern by 109 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper screen (+692k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak M575 and Sony A6400
M575 | A6400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Kodak M575 vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak M575 comes with physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony A6400 has proportions of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Examine the Kodak M575 versus Sony A6400 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the M575 versus the A6400.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M575 and A6400 is 95 and 83 respectively.
Kodak M575 vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by looking through specs. The picture here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the M575 and A6400.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M575 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A6400 will render extra detail utilizing its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged M575 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Kodak M575 vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M575 vs Sony A6400 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M575 | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Sony |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M575 | Sony Alpha a6400 |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-01-05 | 2019-01-15 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 1000 | 32000 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 403 gr (0.89 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $139 | $898 |