Kodak M580 vs Olympus E-30
90 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
60 Imaging
47 Features
54 Overall
49
Kodak M580 vs Olympus E-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 59 x 56mm
- Introduced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 695g - 142 x 108 x 75mm
- Launched March 2009
Kodak M580 vs Olympus E-30 Overview
The following is a extended review of the Kodak M580 and Olympus E-30, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the M580 (14MP) and the E-30 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the M580 (1/2.3") and E-30 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor size.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe M580 was brought out 5 months after the E-30 so they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Kodak M580 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-30 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the M580 matches up versus the E-30 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak M580 vs Olympus E-30 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare M580 and Olympus E-30. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak M580 Gallery and Olympus E-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M580 over the Olympus E-30
M580 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-30 over the Kodak M580
E-30 | M580 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Kodak M580 and Olympus E-30
M580 | E-30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2009 | March 2009 | Similar generation | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Kodak M580 vs Olympus E-30 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M580 offers external measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-30 has dimensions of 142mm x 108mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") with a weight of 695 grams (1.53 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak M580 and Olympus E-30 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the M580 and the E-30.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M580 and E-30 is 90 and 60 respectively.
Kodak M580 vs Olympus E-30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through technical specs. The image underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the M580 and E-30.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M580 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Kodak M580 will give you more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images way more aggressively.
Kodak M580 vs Olympus E-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M580 vs Olympus E-30 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare M580 | Olympus E-30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak EasyShare M580 | Olympus E-30 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-07-29 | 2009-03-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 5:4, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | - |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 45 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal II LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.56x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 13.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Manual, Fill, Red-eye reduction, Slow sync with red-eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync 2nd curtain, Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lb) | 695 grams (1.53 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 59 x 56mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 2.2") | 142 x 108 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.3" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 530 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 750 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | KLIC-7006 | BLM-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II) / xD Picture Card |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $169 | $1,299 |