Clicky

Kodak Sport vs Olympus E-330

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
13
Overall
26
Kodak EasyShare Sport front
 
Olympus E-330 front
Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40

Kodak Sport vs Olympus E-330 Key Specs

Kodak Sport
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1250
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35mm (F3.0) lens
  • 175g - 147 x 58 x 23mm
  • Released January 2011
Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
  • Older Model is Olympus E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-450
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Sport vs Olympus E-330 Overview

Let's look closer at the Kodak Sport vs Olympus E-330, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Kodak and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Sport (12MP) and E-330 (7MP) and the Sport (1/2.3") and E-330 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor sizes.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

The Sport was revealed 4 years later than the E-330 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Sport being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Sport matches up vs the E-330 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Sport over the Olympus E-330

 Sport E-330 
RevealedJanuary 2011March 2006Fresher by 59 months

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Kodak Sport

 E-330 Sport 
Focus manually More accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing2.5"2.4"Larger display (+0.1")
Display resolution215k112kClearer display (+103k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Sport and Olympus E-330

 Sport E-330 
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Kodak Sport vs Olympus E-330 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Sport provides external dimensions of 147mm x 58mm x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 175 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus E-330 has dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs).

Analyze the Kodak Sport vs Olympus E-330 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the Sport against the E-330.

Kodak Sport vs Olympus E-330 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Sport and E-330 is 92 and 65 respectively.

Kodak Sport vs Olympus E-330 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Sport vs Olympus E-330 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The photograph here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Sport and E-330.

As you can tell, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Sport using its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Kodak Sport will offer more detail because of its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The younger Sport is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak Sport vs Olympus E-330 sensor size comparison

Kodak Sport vs Olympus E-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Sport vs Olympus E-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Sport as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-330 as a Portrait photography camera
26
includes face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
54
focusing manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
MP count low (7 megapixels)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Kodak Sport Street photography information
Olympus E-330 Street photography information
52
weather proofing
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
low max ISO (1,250)
60
has a tilting screen
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than competitors in class (616g)
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak Sport
Sports photography with Olympus E-330
23
weather proofing
focal length is fixed (35mm)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
40
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak Sport Travel photography features
Olympus E-330 Travel photography features
57
weather proofing
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
50
lighter than competitors in class (616 grams)
has built in flash
missing Timelapse mode
MP count low (7MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Sport Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-330 Landscape photography factors
27
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
small screen (2.4 inches)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
low max ISO (1,250)
lacks RAW support
does not have Timelapse mode
45
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (2.5")
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
max ISO too low (400)
missing Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Sport as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-330 as a Vlogging camera
25
includes face detect focusing
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone socket
9
lack of video recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak Sport vs Olympus E-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Sport and Olympus E-330
 Kodak EasyShare SportOlympus E-330
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Olympus
Model type Kodak EasyShare Sport Olympus E-330
Also called as - EVOLT E-330
Category Waterproof Advanced DSLR
Released 2011-01-04 2006-03-18
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 7MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 3136 x 2352
Max native ISO 1250 400
Max boosted ISO - 1600
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 3
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 35mm (1x) -
Max aperture f/3.0 -
Amount of lenses - 45
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 2.4 inch 2.5 inch
Resolution of display 112k dot 215k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.47x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1400 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 2.40 m (@ ISO 360) -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 175 gr (0.39 lbs) 616 gr (1.36 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 58 x 23mm (5.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID 2 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $155 $1,100