Kodak Touch vs Olympus TG-320
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Kodak Touch vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Kodak Touch vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Kodak Touch and Olympus TG-320, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Olympus. The image resolution of the Touch (14MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is very similar but the Touch (1/3") and TG-320 (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe Touch was revealed 12 months earlier than the TG-320 so they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Kodak Touch being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the Touch grades against the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Kodak Touch vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Touch & Olympus TG-320. The full galleries are available at Kodak Touch Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Olympus TG-320
| Touch | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Kodak Touch
| TG-320 | Touch | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 12 months |
Common features in the Kodak Touch and Olympus TG-320
| Touch | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Kodak Touch vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Kodak Touch comes with exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Touch and Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Touch versus the TG-320.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Touch and TG-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Touch vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Touch and TG-320.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide the same MP but different sensor dimensions. The Touch has the tinier sensor which should make getting shallow depth of field trickier. The more aged Touch is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Kodak Touch vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Kodak Touch vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Touch | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Olympus |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Touch | Olympus TG-320 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-01-04 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 7.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 150g (0.33 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | KLIC-7006 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $100 | $0 |
