Clicky

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
 
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 front
Portability
88
Imaging
53
Features
37
Overall
46

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs

Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2011
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28mm (F2.5) lens
  • 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
  • Revealed September 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview

Let's look a little more in depth at the Kodak Touch and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Kodak and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Touch (14MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is fairly close but the Touch (1/3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The Touch was released 4 months later than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Touch being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Touch grades versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 Touch GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Kodak Touch

 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Touch 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display resolution920k460kClearer display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Kodak Touch and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 Touch GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
RevealedJanuary 2011September 2010Same age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Touch features physical measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).

Compare the Kodak Touch and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Touch against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Touch and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 95 and 88 respectively.

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through technical specs. The graphic below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the Touch and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

As you have seen, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Touch featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more challenging and the Kodak Touch will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively.

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 sensor size comparison

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Touch Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Portrait photography highlights
33
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/3")
does not have RAW support
58
focusing manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect focus
exports RAW files
no liveview
low megapixels (12MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Touch
Street photography with Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/3")
does not have RAW support
more heavy than average (150 grams)
70
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lighter than competitors (140 grams)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Kodak Touch Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sports photography highlights
28
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
32
nice sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (28mm)
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (5.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
terrible battery power (320 CIPA)
no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Kodak Touch as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 as a Travel photography camera
68
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than average (150 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
59
lighter than competitors (140 grams)
built-in flash
terrible battery power (320 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Touch Landscape photography info
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Landscape photography info
42
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/3")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
48
focusing manually
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
terrible battery power (320 shots)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Touch Vlogging information
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Vlogging information
31
reasonably wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
built-in touchscreen
provides face detect autofocus
does not offer selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone socket
more heavy than average (150g)
28
features face detect focus
lighter than competitors (140 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone support
Photography Glossary

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Touch and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
 Kodak EasyShare TouchRicoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
General Information
Make Kodak Ricoh
Model Kodak EasyShare Touch Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
Type Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2011-01-04 2010-09-21
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - GR Engine III
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 4.8 x 3.6mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 17.3mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4288 x 2848
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.5
Macro focus distance 5cm -
Crop factor 7.5 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech TFT color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 8 secs 180 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/1600 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.20 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150 grams (0.33 pounds) 140 grams (0.31 pounds)
Physical dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 320 photographs
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model KLIC-7006 DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Type of storage MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $100 $566