Clicky

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh PX

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35
Kodak EasyShare Touch front
 
Ricoh PX front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh PX Key Specs

Kodak Touch
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released January 2011
Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Released August 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh PX Overview

In this write-up, we are contrasting the Kodak Touch and Ricoh PX, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Touch (14MP) and the PX (16MP) is very similar but the Touch (1/3") and PX (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Touch was manufactured 7 months earlier than the PX and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Touch being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Touch scores vs the PX with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Ricoh PX

 Touch PX 
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Kodak Touch

 PX Touch 
ReleasedAugust 2011January 2011Fresher by 7 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing

Common features in the Kodak Touch and Ricoh PX

 Touch PX 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison

When you are intending to carry your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Touch has outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Ricoh PX has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

See the Kodak Touch and Ricoh PX in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the Touch and the PX.

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh PX size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Touch and PX is 95 and 95 respectively.

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Touch and PX.

As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Touch because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Ricoh PX will deliver greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The older Touch is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Touch Portrait photography factors
Ricoh PX Portrait photography factors
33
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/3")
lacks RAW files
43
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Touch
Street photography with Ricoh PX
48
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/3")
lacks RAW files
heavier than others in class (150 grams)
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Kodak Touch Sports photography advice
Ricoh PX Sports photography advice
28
megapixel count good (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/3")
lacks phase detect AF
44
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
provides tracking focus
weather proof
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak Touch
Travel photography with Ricoh PX
68
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
does not have Time Lapse function
heavier than others in class (150g)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
68
weather proof
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Touch Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh PX Landscape photography highlights
42
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
nice screen size (3")
megapixel count good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
47
focusing manually
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
weather proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
missing Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Kodak Touch
Vlogging with Ricoh PX
31
decently wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f)
has touchscreen
comes with face detection focusing
doesn't have selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic jack
heavier than others in class (150g)
31
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not contain selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak Touch vs Ricoh PX Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Touch and Ricoh PX
 Kodak EasyShare TouchRicoh PX
General Information
Brand Name Kodak Ricoh
Model Kodak EasyShare Touch Ricoh PX
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2011-01-04 2011-08-16
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 4.8 x 3.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 17.3mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3072
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.9-5.4
Macro focus range 5cm 3cm
Crop factor 7.5 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 8 secs 8 secs
Max shutter speed 1/1600 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.20 m 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 150g (0.33 lb) 156g (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model KLIC-7006 DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $100 $329