Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh WG-4
68 Imaging
39 Features
42 Overall
40
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Kodak Z5120 and Ricoh WG-4, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Z5120 (16MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is very well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Z5120 was released 3 years before the WG-4 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Kodak Z5120 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Z5120 grades versus the WG-4 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z5120 & Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are available at Kodak Z5120 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z5120 over the Ricoh WG-4
| Z5120 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Kodak Z5120
| WG-4 | Z5120 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 25 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z5120 and Ricoh WG-4
| Z5120 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither contains Touch display |
Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak Z5120 has got outer dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Z5120 and Ricoh WG-4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Z5120 versus the WG-4.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z5120 and WG-4 is 68 and 90 respectively.
Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The pic below will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z5120 and WG-4.
Plainly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same resolution so you can expect similar quality of images though you would want to consider the age of the products into consideration. The more aged Z5120 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z5120 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z5120 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Kodak | Ricoh |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z5120 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 2456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.90 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445 grams (0.98 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $200 | $330 |
