Clicky

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II

Portability
91
Imaging
33
Features
18
Overall
27
Kodak EasyShare Z915 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs

Kodak Z915
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
  • 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
  • Launched January 2009
Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview

Lets look a bit more in depth at the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the Z915 (1/2.3") and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) have different sensor sizing.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The Z915 was introduced 8 years earlier than the E-M1 II which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Kodak Z915 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the Z915 grades against the E-M1 II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 Z915 E-M1 II 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Kodak Z915

 E-M1 II Z915 
RevealedSeptember 2016January 2009Newer by 93 months
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1037k230kClearer screen (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Olympus E-M1 II

 Z915 E-M1 II 

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison

If you're looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z915 offers outer dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).

Contrast the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the Z915 vs the E-M1 II.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z915 and E-M1 II is 91 and 68 respectively.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The image here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Z915 and E-M1 II.

As you can tell, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Z915 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with greater detail using its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Z915 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II sensor size comparison

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z915 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Portrait photography camera
19
no manual focus
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
76
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Kodak Z915 Street photography factors
Olympus E-M1 II Street photography factors
54
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
78
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
offers touch to focus
weather sealing
lighter than others (574 grams)
very good ISO range (25,600)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z915 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
24
image stabilization (Optical)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,250s)
max frames per second low (2.0 fps)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
75
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
high frames per second (60.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect AF
bad battery life (350 shots)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Kodak Z915 Travel photography highlights
Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography highlights
54
built-in flash
great reach (350mm)
no Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (10MP)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
72
lighter than others (574g)
weather sealing
offers touch to focus
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
bad battery life (350 CIPA)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Z915 Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography factors
27
image stabilization (Optical)
no manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Timelapse mode
76
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
does not have low pass filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather sealing
has double storage slots
bad battery life (350 shots)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z915 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-M1 II as a Vlogging camera
24
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
no external microphone support
79
selfie friendly screen
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focusing
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
includes external microphone port
lighter than others (574 grams)
Photography Glossary

Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z915 and Olympus E-M1 II
 Kodak EasyShare Z915Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
General Information
Brand Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare Z915 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Class Small Sensor Compact Pro Mirrorless
Launched 2009-01-08 2016-09-19
Body design Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW format
Min enhanced ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 25 121
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 35-350mm (10.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.5-4.8 -
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Number of lenses - 107
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 16 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1250 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Fastest silent shutter speed - 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 2.0fps 60.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m 9.10 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 640x480 4096x2160
Video file format Motion JPEG MOV, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 194 grams (0.43 pounds) 574 grams (1.27 pounds)
Physical dimensions 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 80
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.8
DXO Low light score not tested 1312
Other
Battery life - 350 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model 2 x AA BLH-1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots
Storage slots 1 2
Launch pricing $200 $1,700