Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the Z915 (1/2.3") and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) have different sensor sizing.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe Z915 was introduced 8 years earlier than the E-M1 II which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Kodak Z915 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the Z915 grades against the E-M1 II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Olympus E-M1 II
Z915 | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Kodak Z915
E-M1 II | Z915 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | January 2009 | Newer by 93 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Olympus E-M1 II
Z915 | E-M1 II |
---|
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z915 offers outer dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the Z915 vs the E-M1 II.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z915 and E-M1 II is 91 and 68 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching technical specs. The image here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Z915 and E-M1 II.
As you can tell, both the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Z915 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF harder and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide you with greater detail using its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Z915 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Z915 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | - |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 60.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MOV, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | 1 | 2 |
Launch pricing | $200 | $1,700 |