Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Kodak Z915 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Z915 (10MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is very well matched but the Z915 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Z915 was revealed 10 months prior to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro so they are of a similar age. The two cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Z915 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Z915 grades vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are viewable at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Z915 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Kodak Z915
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | Z915 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2009 | January 2009 | More modern by 10 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Z915 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z915 offers physical dimensions of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Z915 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the Z915 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z915 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 91 and 77 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through specifications. The picture here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Z915 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Z915 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will resolve greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged Z915 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Z915 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Ricoh |
Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 seconds | 180 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1250 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194g (0.43 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $200 | $566 |