Kodak Z915 vs Samsung NX1
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
66 Imaging
68 Features
90 Overall
76
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung NX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Expand to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 550g - 139 x 102 x 66mm
- Launched September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Kodak Z915 vs Samsung NX1 Overview
Here is a complete comparison of the Kodak Z915 and Samsung NX1, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Kodak and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and NX1 (28MP) and the Z915 (1/2.3") and NX1 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Z915 was manufactured 6 years before the NX1 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Z915 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Z915 grades vs the NX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Kodak Z915 vs Samsung NX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Samsung NX1. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Samsung NX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Samsung NX1
| Z915 | NX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1 over the Kodak Z915
| NX1 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 69 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1036k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+806k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Samsung NX1
| Z915 | NX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung NX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Kodak Z915 comes with external measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX1 has sizing of 139mm x 102mm x 66mm (5.5" x 4.0" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Contrast the Kodak Z915 and Samsung NX1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the Z915 vs the NX1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z915 and NX1 is 91 and 66 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung NX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by going through specifications. The photograph below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Z915 and NX1.
To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Z915 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Samsung NX1 will provide greater detail due to its extra 18 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older Z915 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung NX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung NX1 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Samsung NX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Samsung NX1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2014-09-15 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | DRIMe 5 |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 28 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6480 x 4320 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 209 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 153 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 32 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 1,036k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1250 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | 15.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m | 11.00 m (ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 4096x2160 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.265 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 194g (0.43 pounds) | 550g (1.21 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 139 x 102 x 66mm (5.5" x 4.0" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 83 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1363 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 500 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | BP1900 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $200 | $1,500 |
