Kodak Z915 vs Samsung WB210
91 Imaging
33 Features
18 Overall
27
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 194g - 90 x 64 x 39mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
Photography Glossary Kodak Z915 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Following is a in-depth overview of the Kodak Z915 vs Samsung WB210, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Kodak and Samsung. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the Z915 (10MP) and WB210 (14MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Z915 was launched 3 years prior to the WB210 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Z915 grades versus the WB210 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Kodak Z915 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z915 & Samsung WB210. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Z915 Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z915 over the Samsung WB210
| Z915 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Clearer screen (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Kodak Z915
| WB210 | Z915 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 30 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Z915 and Samsung WB210
| Z915 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z915 provides physical measurements of 90mm x 64mm x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has proportions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Compare the Kodak Z915 vs Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the Z915 vs the WB210.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Z915 and WB210 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The image below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Z915 and WB210.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung WB210 to result in more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged Z915 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Kodak Z915 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Kodak | Samsung |
| Model | Kodak EasyShare Z915 | Samsung WB210 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-350mm (10.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-4.8 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 16s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1250s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) | 174 grams (0.38 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 64 x 39mm (3.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 2 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $200 | $279 |
