Clicky

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus E-300

Portability
68
Imaging
35
Features
40
Overall
37
Kodak EasyShare Z980 front
 
Olympus E-300 front
Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs

Kodak Z980
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-330
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus E-300 Overview

Following is a extensive comparison of the Kodak Z980 vs Olympus E-300, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Kodak and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the Z980 (12MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the Z980 (1/2.3") and E-300 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Z980 was released 4 years after the E-300 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Kodak Z980 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Z980 scores against the E-300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Z980 over the Olympus E-300

 Z980 E-300 
ReleasedJanuary 2009January 2005More modern by 49 months
Display dimensions3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution201k134kClearer display (+67k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Kodak Z980

 E-300 Z980 

Common features in the Kodak Z980 and Olympus E-300

 Z980 E-300 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Kodak Z980 has got exterior measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-300 has dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).

Examine the Kodak Z980 vs Olympus E-300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the Z980 vs the E-300.

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus E-300 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Z980 and E-300 is 68 and 67 respectively.

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus E-300 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at technical specs. The image below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Z980 and E-300.

As you have seen, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Z980 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Kodak Z980 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The fresher Z980 should have an edge in sensor technology.

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus E-300 sensor size comparison

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Z980 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-300 Portrait photography highlights
41
manual focus
exports RAW files
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
48
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
low megapixels (8MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Kodak Z980 Street photography features
Olympus E-300 Street photography features
54
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
51
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Kodak Z980 Sports photography advice
Olympus E-300 Sports photography advice
34
amazing zoom range (26-624mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
continuous shooting slow (1.0 fps)
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Kodak Z980
Travel photography with Olympus E-300
51
has built in flash
rather wide (26mm)
great zoom (624mm)
no Timelapse mode
low MP (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
45
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
low megapixels (8MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Z980 Landscape photography factors
Olympus E-300 Landscape photography factors
45
manual focus
rather wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
no Timelapse mode
43
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is small (1.8 inches)
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Z980 Vlogging features
Olympus E-300 Vlogging features
23
rather wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone port
9
lack of video recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak Z980 vs Olympus E-300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Z980 and Olympus E-300
 Kodak EasyShare Z980Olympus E-300
General Information
Brand Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak EasyShare Z980 Olympus E-300
Also Known as - EVOLT E-300
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2009-01-05 2005-01-10
Body design Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 8 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 3264 x 2448
Max native ISO 6400 400
Max boosted ISO - 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 25 3
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 26-624mm (24.0x) -
Highest aperture f/2.8-5.0 -
Macro focus range 10cm -
Available lenses - 45
Focal length multiplier 5.9 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 1.8 inch
Display resolution 201k dot 134k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (pentamirror)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 16 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 6.30 m -
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 445 gr (0.98 lbs) 624 gr (1.38 lbs)
Physical dimensions 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal Compact Flash (Type I or II)
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $249 $800