Kodak Z990 vs Samsung SL102
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Other Name is EasyShare Max
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Also Known as ES55
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Kodak Z990 vs Samsung SL102, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Kodak and Samsung. The resolution of the Z990 (12MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is pretty close and both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Z990 was launched 2 years later than the SL102 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Kodak Z990 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Z990 scores against the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak EasyShare Z990 and Samsung SL102. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Z990 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Samsung SL102
Z990 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | January 2009 | More recent by 25 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Kodak Z990
SL102 | Z990 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Z990 and Samsung SL102
Z990 | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z990 features exterior dimensions of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Kodak Z990 vs Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Z990 and the SL102.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z990 and SL102 is 68 and 96 respectively.
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements purely by researching technical specs. The graphic here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Z990 and SL102.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should expect the Kodak Z990 to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern Z990 should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Z990 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Samsung |
Model | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Samsung SL102 |
Also called | EasyShare Max | ES55 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-01-04 | 2009-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.90 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 445 grams (0.98 lb) | 116 grams (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $299 | $130 |