Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX350
68 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
62 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 445g - 124 x 91 x 105mm
- Introduced January 2011
- Alternate Name is EasyShare Max
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Introduced December 2016
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX350 Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX350, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Kodak and Sony. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the Z990 (12MP) and HX350 (20MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Z990 was brought out 7 years earlier than the HX350 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-like (bridge)).
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Z990 grades vs the HX350 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX350 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak EasyShare Z990 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Z990 Gallery & Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Z990 over the Sony HX350
| Z990 | HX350 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Kodak Z990
| HX350 | Z990 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2016 | January 2011 | More recent by 72 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Kodak Z990 and Sony HX350
| Z990 | HX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Kodak Z990 enjoys exterior measurements of 124mm x 91mm x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") having a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) whilst the Sony HX350 has proportions of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") and a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX350 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Z990 against the HX350.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z990 and HX350 is 68 and 62 respectively.
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements only by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Z990 and HX350.
As you have seen, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Sony HX350 to render extra detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images far more aggressively. The older Z990 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Kodak Z990 vs Sony HX350 Specifications
| Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Kodak | Sony |
| Model type | Kodak EasyShare Z990 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
| Also Known as | EasyShare Max | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-01-04 | 2016-12-20 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-840mm (30.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 202 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.90 m | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 445 gr (0.98 lb) | 652 gr (1.44 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 91 x 105mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 4.1") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $299 | - |