Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P1
99 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 58 x 15mm
- Launched August 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Later Model is Olympus E-P2
Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P1 Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Kodak M590 versus Olympus E-P1, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Kodak and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the M590 (14MP) and the E-P1 (12MP) is very close but the M590 (1/3") and E-P1 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe M590 was manufactured 13 months later than the E-P1 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak M590 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-P1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the M590 scores vs the E-P1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Kodak M590 & Olympus PEN E-P1. The entire galleries are available at Kodak M590 Gallery & Olympus E-P1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak M590 over the Olympus E-P1
M590 | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2010 | July 2009 | More recent by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P1 over the Kodak M590
E-P1 | M590 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Kodak M590 and Olympus E-P1
M590 | E-P1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Kodak M590 enjoys outer measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Olympus E-P1 has sizing of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Check the Kodak M590 versus Olympus E-P1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the M590 vs the E-P1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M590 and E-P1 is 99 and 86 respectively.
Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the M590 and E-P1.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M590 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Kodak M590 will result in more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger M590 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P1 Specifications
Kodak M590 | Olympus PEN E-P1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak M590 | Olympus PEN E-P1 |
Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-08-23 | 2009-07-29 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 4.8 x 3.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 17.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3242 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | () | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 7.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1400 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 355 gr (0.78 lb) |
Dimensions | 97 x 58 x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $120 | $182 |