Clicky

Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P2

Portability
99
Imaging
36
Features
20
Overall
29
Kodak M590 front
 
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45

Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs

Kodak M590
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 97 x 58 x 15mm
  • Introduced August 2010
Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Launched April 2010
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-P3
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P2 Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P2, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the M590 (14MP) and the E-P2 (12MP) is very close but the M590 (1/3") and E-P2 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The M590 was unveiled 5 months after the E-P2 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Kodak M590 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the M590 matches up against the E-P2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak M590 over the Olympus E-P2

 M590 E-P2 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Kodak M590

 E-P2 M590 
Manually focus Dial exact focus
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")

Common features in the Kodak M590 and Olympus E-P2

 M590 E-P2 
LaunchedAugust 2010April 2010Same age
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch display No Touch display

Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Kodak M590 has got outside dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Olympus E-P2 has dimensions of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Compare the Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the M590 against the E-P2.

Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P2 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the M590 and E-P2 is 99 and 86 respectively.

Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P2 top view buttons comparison

Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The picture below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M590 and E-P2.

As you have seen, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M590 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Kodak M590 will render greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images more aggressively.

Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P2 sensor size comparison

Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak M590 Portrait photography info
Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography info
29
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/3")
does not have RAW support
60
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
MP count low (12 megapixels)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Kodak M590 Street photography details
Olympus E-P2 Street photography details
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/3")
does not have RAW support
74
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Kodak M590 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Sports photography camera
34
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14MP)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
very small sensor size (1/3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
40
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
MP count low (12MP)
bad battery (300 shots)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Kodak M590 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Travel photography camera
70
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
good max aperture (f)
missing Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
43
lack of Timelapse recording
bad battery (300 CIPA)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Kodak M590 Landscape photography details
Olympus E-P2 Landscape photography details
39
good max aperture (f)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14MP)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (()mm)
screen is small (2.5")
very small sensor size (1/3")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
60
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
MP count low (12MP)
bad battery (300 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse recording
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak M590 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-P2 as a Vlogging camera
31
good max aperture (f)
has image stabilization (Optical)
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing microphone jack
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect autofocus
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Kodak M590 vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak M590 and Olympus E-P2
 Kodak M590Olympus PEN E-P2
General Information
Make Kodak Olympus
Model Kodak M590 Olympus PEN E-P2
Class Ultracompact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2010-08-23 2010-04-22
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic V
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/3" Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 4.8 x 3.6mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 17.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio - 4:3
Highest resolution 4320 x 3242 4032 x 3024
Highest native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range () -
Total lenses - 107
Crop factor 7.5 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5" 3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech - HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1400 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight - 355 grams (0.78 pounds)
Physical dimensions 97 x 58 x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 56
DXO Color Depth score not tested 21.5
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.4
DXO Low light score not tested 505
Other
Battery life - 300 shots
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-1
Self timer - Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage - SD/SDHC card
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $120 $799