Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Overview
Below is a comprehensive review of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Kodak and Leica. The image resolution of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) is fairly comparable but the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) possess different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was introduced 16 months later than the M-E Typ 220 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Leica M-E Typ 220 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 grades versus the M-E Typ 220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Leica M-E Typ 220. The whole galleries are provided at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
Astro Zoom AZ651 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | September 2012 | More recent by 16 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
M-E Typ 220 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Leica M-E Typ 220
Astro Zoom AZ651 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 enjoys exterior dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Leica M-E Typ 220 has measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 vs the M-E Typ 220.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and M-E Typ 220 is 65 and 79 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The photograph below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and M-E Typ 220.
Plainly, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Astro Zoom AZ651 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will produce extra detail using its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The fresher Astro Zoom AZ651 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Leica M-E Typ 220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Leica |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Leica M-E Typ 220 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2012-09-17 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5212 x 3472 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 2500 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Leica M |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 59 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | - | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567g (1.25 lbs) | 585g (1.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 787 |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $419 | $0 |