Clicky

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220

Portability
65
Imaging
46
Features
56
Overall
50
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
 
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Key Specs

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Revealed September 2012
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Overview

Below is a comprehensive review of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Kodak and Leica. The image resolution of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) is fairly comparable but the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) possess different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was introduced 16 months later than the M-E Typ 220 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Leica M-E Typ 220 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a brief view of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 grades versus the M-E Typ 220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 Astro Zoom AZ651 M-E Typ 220 
RevealedJanuary 2014September 2012More recent by 16 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 M-E Typ 220 Astro Zoom AZ651 

Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Leica M-E Typ 220

 Astro Zoom AZ651 M-E Typ 220 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Touch display Neither features Touch display

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 enjoys exterior dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Leica M-E Typ 220 has measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).

Check out the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 vs the M-E Typ 220.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and M-E Typ 220 is 65 and 79 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The photograph below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and M-E Typ 220.

Plainly, both of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Astro Zoom AZ651 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will produce extra detail using its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The fresher Astro Zoom AZ651 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 sensor size comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Portrait photography features
Leica M-E Typ 220 Portrait photography features
54
manual focus
resolution is good (21MP)
offers face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
71
manual focus
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
doesn't have liveview
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Street photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
59
screen articulates
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
very small sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than others (567g)
65
great sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Sports photography camera
Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Sports photography camera
51
great zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (21MP)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
46
MP count decent (18MP)
great sensor size (Full frame)
doesn't have liveview
max fps very slow (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Travel photography camera
Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Travel photography camera
60
resolution is good (21MP)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
decently wide (24mm)
long reach (1560mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than others (567g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
57
MP count decent (18MP)
does not have Timelapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography details
Leica M-E Typ 220 Landscape photography details
54
manual focus
decently wide (24mm)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (21MP)
delivers RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have Time Lapse mode
61
manual focus
swap lenses (Leica M mount)
MP count decent (18 megapixels)
great sensor size (Full frame)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (2.5")
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
does not have Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging factors
Leica M-E Typ 220 Vlogging factors
60
decently wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
does not have mic support
heavier than others (567g)
9
no video recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Leica M-E Typ 220
 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651Leica M-E Typ 220
General Information
Manufacturer Kodak Leica
Model Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 Leica M-E Typ 220
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Pro Mirrorless
Introduced 2014-01-07 2012-09-17
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 36 x 24mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 864.0mm²
Sensor resolution 21 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 5212 x 3472
Highest native ISO 3200 2500
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Leica M
Lens focal range 24-1560mm (65.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.9-6.5 -
Macro focus range 3cm -
Available lenses - 59
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 2.5 inches
Screen resolution 920k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (rangefinder)
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification - 0.68x
Features
Slowest shutter speed - 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 9.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash modes - Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 567g (1.25 lbs) 585g (1.29 lbs)
Dimensions 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 69
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.7
DXO Low light score not tested 787
Other
Self timer - Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type - SD/SDHC card
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $419 $0