Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-M10 IV
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
81 Imaging
63 Features
83 Overall
71
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Released August 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 III
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus E-M10 IV, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Kodak and Olympus. The resolution of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and the E-M10 IV (20MP) is relatively well matched but the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was released 7 years before the E-M10 IV and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores versus the E-M10 IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV. The complete galleries are available at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
Astro Zoom AZ651 | E-M10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
E-M10 IV | Astro Zoom AZ651 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2020 | January 2014 | Fresher by 80 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus E-M10 IV
Astro Zoom AZ651 | E-M10 IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 provides outer measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 IV has specifications of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs).
Check out the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus E-M10 IV in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 versus the E-M10 IV.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and E-M10 IV is 65 and 81 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The graphic below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and E-M10 IV.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Astro Zoom AZ651 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will give more detail as a result of its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older Astro Zoom AZ651 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2020-08-04 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames per sec | 8.7 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash settings | - | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567 grams (1.25 lb) | 383 grams (0.84 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $419 | $699 |