Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus 7000
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus 7000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 37-260mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 172g - 96 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Also Known as mju 7000
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus 7000 Overview
Below is a detailed assessment of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Olympus 7000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Kodak and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and 7000 (12MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuitThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was manufactured 5 years later than the 7000 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus 7000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 matches up versus the 7000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus 7000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Olympus Stylus 7000. The entire galleries are viewable at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Olympus 7000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Olympus 7000
Astro Zoom AZ651 | 7000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | January 2009 | More recent by 61 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7000 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
7000 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus 7000
Astro Zoom AZ651 | 7000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus 7000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has got physical dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") having a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Olympus 7000 has proportions of 96mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 172 grams (0.38 lbs).
Analyze the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 versus Olympus 7000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and the 7000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and 7000 is 65 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus 7000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The visual below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and 7000.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to resolve extra detail due to its extra 9MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The more recent Astro Zoom AZ651 provides an edge in sensor technology.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus 7000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus 7000 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Olympus Stylus 7000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Olympus Stylus 7000 |
Also Known as | - | mju 7000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2009-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 37-260mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 2cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567 grams (1.25 pounds) | 172 grams (0.38 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 96 x 56 x 25mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $419 | $280 |