Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-310
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2011
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-310, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Kodak and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and TG-310 (14MP) but they come with the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was introduced 3 years after the TG-310 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores against the TG-310 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus TG-310. The whole galleries are available at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Olympus TG-310
Astro Zoom AZ651 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | January 2011 | Newer by 37 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
TG-310 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Olympus TG-310
Astro Zoom AZ651 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 enjoys outer dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") having a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-310 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 against the TG-310.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and TG-310 is 65 and 94 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking specifications. The pic underneath may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and TG-310.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to give you greater detail using its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent Astro Zoom AZ651 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Olympus TG-310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Kodak | Olympus |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Olympus TG-310 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.20 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567g (1.25 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $419 | $0 |