Clicky

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48

Portability
65
Imaging
46
Features
56
Overall
50
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
21
Overall
29

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Launched January 2014
Panasonic FX48
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2009
  • Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX40
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and FX48 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was launched 5 years after the FX48 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic FX48 being a Compact camera.

Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 matches up against the FX48 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Panasonic FX48

 Astro Zoom AZ651 FX48 
RevealedJanuary 2014January 2009Newer by 61 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k230kClearer screen (+690k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 FX48 Astro Zoom AZ651 

Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic FX48

 Astro Zoom AZ651 FX48 
Touch screen No Touch screen

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has got outer measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX48 has specifications of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).

See the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 vs the FX48.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and FX48 is 65 and 95 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The image underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and FX48.

To sum up, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 9MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher Astro Zoom AZ651 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic FX48 as a Portrait photography camera
54
manual focus
decent megapixels (21 megapixels)
provides face detection focusing
supports RAW files
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
27
includes face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FX48 as a Street photography camera
59
screen articulates
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW files
very small sensor (1/2.3")
more heavy than competitors (567 grams)
57
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FX48 as a Sports photography camera
51
incredible zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (21MP)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow frames per second (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Travel photography factors
Panasonic FX48 Travel photography factors
60
decent megapixels (21MP)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
rather wide (24mm)
very long zoom (1560mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors (567g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
58
has built in flash
really wide (25mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
low resolution sensor (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FX48 Landscape photography factors
54
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (21 megapixels)
supports RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no Timelapse function
33
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.5 inches)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging info
Panasonic FX48 Vlogging info
60
rather wide (24mm)
selfie friendly display
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
no external microphone support
more heavy than competitors (567g)
31
really wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic FX48
 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48
General Information
Company Kodak Panasonic
Model Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48
Also Known as - Lumix DMC-FX40
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2014-01-07 2009-01-27
Body design SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 21MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Highest enhanced ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 25 11
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 24-1560mm (65.0x) 25-125mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.9-6.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focus range 3cm 5cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 2.5"
Screen resolution 920 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Features
Minimum shutter speed - 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/3000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 9.0 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 6.00 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 567g (1.25 lb) 150g (0.33 lb)
Dimensions 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Self timer - Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage - SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $419 $325