Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
95 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX40
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Kodak and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and FX48 (12MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was launched 5 years after the FX48 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic FX48 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 matches up against the FX48 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Panasonic FX48 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Panasonic FX48
Astro Zoom AZ651 | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | January 2009 | Newer by 61 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
FX48 | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Panasonic FX48
Astro Zoom AZ651 | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 has got outer measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX48 has specifications of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 vs the FX48.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and FX48 is 65 and 95 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out specifications. The image underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and FX48.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to produce greater detail utilizing its extra 9MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher Astro Zoom AZ651 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Panasonic |
Model | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX40 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-01-07 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 567g (1.25 lb) | 150g (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $419 | $325 |