Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
85 Imaging
34 Features
48 Overall
39
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Announced August 2010
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Kodak and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Astro Zoom AZ651 was released 3 years after the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 matches up against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The complete galleries are viewable at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
Astro Zoom AZ651 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2014 | August 2010 | Newer by 42 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
Astro Zoom AZ651 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | Same display resolution | |
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 features outer measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") along with a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has proportions of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
See the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 65 and 85 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by going through specs. The picture below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to show extra detail as a result of its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The newer Astro Zoom AZ651 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Kodak | Ricoh |
Model type | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2010-08-06 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 9.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567g (1.25 pounds) | 367g (0.81 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $419 | $147 |