Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
65 Imaging
46 Features
56 Overall
50
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Revealed March 2010
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Kodak and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the Astro Zoom AZ651 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizes.
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%The Astro Zoom AZ651 was unveiled 3 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 matches up against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are available at Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Astro Zoom AZ651 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | March 2010 | More modern by 47 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Astro Zoom AZ651 |
---|
Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Astro Zoom AZ651 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 920k | Same screen resolution | |
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 offers physical dimensions of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Examine the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 compared to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 65 and 85 respectively.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through technical specs. The picture underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Astro Zoom AZ651 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 will show extra detail having an extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer Astro Zoom AZ651 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Kodak | Ricoh |
Model type | Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-01-07 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1560mm (65.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | - | 180 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 567 grams (1.25 lbs) | 355 grams (0.78 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $419 | $349 |