Clicky

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung ST6500

Portability
65
Imaging
46
Features
56
Overall
50
Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 front
 
Samsung ST6500 front
Portability
99
Imaging
39
Features
29
Overall
35

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung ST6500 Key Specs

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
(Full Review)
  • 21MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1560mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 567g - 125 x 114 x 89mm
  • Announced January 2014
Samsung ST6500
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 102 x 57 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2011
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung ST6500 Overview

Here, we will be analyzing the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung ST6500, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Kodak and Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the Astro Zoom AZ651 (21MP) and ST6500 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The Astro Zoom AZ651 was introduced 3 years after the ST6500 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung ST6500 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Astro Zoom AZ651 scores versus the ST6500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 over the Samsung ST6500

 Astro Zoom AZ651 ST6500 
AnnouncedJanuary 2014January 2011More modern by 37 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Samsung ST6500 over the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651

 ST6500 Astro Zoom AZ651 
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung ST6500

 Astro Zoom AZ651 ST6500 
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung ST6500 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 enjoys exterior measurements of 125mm x 114mm x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST6500 has proportions of 102mm x 57mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Look at the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung ST6500 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the Astro Zoom AZ651 versus the ST6500.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung ST6500 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Astro Zoom AZ651 and ST6500 is 65 and 99 respectively.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung ST6500 top view buttons comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung ST6500 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Astro Zoom AZ651 and ST6500.

As you can see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 to render more detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher Astro Zoom AZ651 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung ST6500 sensor size comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and ViewFinder

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung ST6500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Portrait photography details
Samsung ST6500 Portrait photography details
54
you can focus manually
good resolution (21 megapixels)
features face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
30
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Street photography details
Samsung ST6500 Street photography details
59
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
sensor is small (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (567 grams)
50
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651
Sports photography with Samsung ST6500
51
long zoom range (24-1560mm 65.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (21 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
29
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung ST6500 as a Travel photography camera
60
good resolution (21MP)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
fairly wide (24mm)
very long reach (1560mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (567 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
74
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (26mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung ST6500 Landscape photography highlights
54
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (21MP)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse function
43
rather wide (26mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 Vlogging info
Samsung ST6500 Vlogging info
60
fairly wide (24mm)
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.9)
lack of external mic socket
heavier than competition (567 grams)
32
rather wide (26mm)
fast maximum aperture (f)
built-in touchscreen
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have external mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 vs Samsung ST6500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Kodak Astro Zoom AZ651 and Samsung ST6500
 Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651Samsung ST6500
General Information
Make Kodak Samsung
Model type Kodak Pixpro Astro Zoom AZ651 Samsung ST6500
Class Small Sensor Superzoom Ultracompact
Announced 2014-01-07 2011-01-19
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 21MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 25 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-1560mm (65.0x) 26-130mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.9-6.5 -
Macro focusing distance 3cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 920k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Features
Slowest shutter speed - 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 9.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 567 gr (1.25 pounds) -
Physical dimensions 125 x 114 x 89mm (4.9" x 4.5" x 3.5") 102 x 57 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Time lapse shooting
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $419 -