Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus 6020
64 Imaging
44 Features
38 Overall
41
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 670g - 131 x 93 x 67mm
- Introduced July 2005
- Also referred to as Dynax 5D
- Successor is Sony A100
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 6020
Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Konica Minolta 5D and Olympus 6020, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Konica and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the Minolta 5D (6MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the Minolta 5D (APS-C) and 6020 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To CamerasThe Minolta 5D was unveiled 5 years earlier than the 6020 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Konica Minolta 5D being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Minolta 5D grades against the 6020 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The full galleries are viewable at Konica Minolta 5D Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Konica Minolta 5D over the Olympus 6020
Minolta 5D | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Konica Minolta 5D
6020 | Minolta 5D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2010 | July 2005 | Fresher by 55 months | |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Konica Minolta 5D and Olympus 6020
Minolta 5D | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Konica Minolta 5D features external measurements of 131mm x 93mm x 67mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus 6020 has measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check out the Konica Minolta 5D and Olympus 6020 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the Minolta 5D and the 6020.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Minolta 5D and 6020 is 64 and 95 respectively.
Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The visual underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Minolta 5D and 6020.
As you have seen, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Minolta 5D having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus 6020 will give greater detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older Minolta 5D is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Konica Minolta 5D vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Konica | Olympus |
Model | Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Also called as | Dynax 5D | mju Tough 6020 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2005-07-15 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 6 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3008 x 2000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sony/Minolta Alpha | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 143 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.55x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 1/4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 pounds) | 122 grams (0.27 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 131 x 93 x 67mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 58 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 605 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-400 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $1,100 | $279 |