Konica Minolta 7D vs Panasonic ZS200
57 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Konica Minolta 7D vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 845g - 150 x 106 x 78mm
- Launched January 2005
- Other Name is Dynax 7D / Alpha-7 Digital
- Later Model is Sony A700
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Additionally Known as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS100
Konica Minolta 7D vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Konica Minolta 7D versus Panasonic ZS200, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Konica and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the Minolta 7D (6MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the Minolta 7D (APS-C) and ZS200 (1") enjoy different sensor sizing.
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks SuggestThe Minolta 7D was brought out 14 years earlier than the ZS200 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Konica Minolta 7D being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Minolta 7D matches up against the ZS200 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Konica Minolta 7D vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D and Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The entire galleries are viewable at Konica Minolta 7D Gallery and Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Konica Minolta 7D over the Panasonic ZS200
Minolta 7D | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Konica Minolta 7D
ZS200 | Minolta 7D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | January 2005 | Fresher by 159 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 207k | Sharper display (+1033k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Konica Minolta 7D and Panasonic ZS200
Minolta 7D | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Konica Minolta 7D vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Konica Minolta 7D features exterior measurements of 150mm x 106mm x 78mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 845 grams (1.86 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has proportions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") and a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
See the Konica Minolta 7D versus Panasonic ZS200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the Minolta 7D vs the ZS200.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Minolta 7D and ZS200 is 57 and 86 respectively.
Konica Minolta 7D vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by looking at specifications. The photograph here will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Minolta 7D and ZS200.
Plainly, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Minolta 7D due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic ZS200 will resolve greater detail having its extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older Minolta 7D is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Konica Minolta 7D vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Konica Minolta 7D vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Konica | Panasonic |
Model type | Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Otherwise known as | Dynax 7D / Alpha-7 Digital | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2005-01-17 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 6 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3008 x 2000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Sony/Minolta Alpha | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 143 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 207k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.6x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 845g (1.86 pounds) | 340g (0.75 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 106 x 78mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.1") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 58 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.0 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 613 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 400 shots | 370 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-400 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $1,000 | $800 |