Leica C-Lux vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
85 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Leica C-Lux vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 113 x 67 x 46mm
- Launched June 2018
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Launched December 2012
Leica C-Lux vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Leica C-Lux versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Leica and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the C-Lux (20MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the C-Lux (1") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe C-Lux was revealed 5 years later than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Leica C-Lux being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the C-Lux scores versus the XZ-2 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica C-Lux vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica C-Lux & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Leica C-Lux Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica C-Lux over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
C-Lux | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2018 | December 2012 | More recent by 67 months | |
Display resolution | 1240k | 920k | Sharper display (+320k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Leica C-Lux
XZ-2 iHS | C-Lux | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Leica C-Lux and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
C-Lux | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Leica C-Lux vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Leica C-Lux comes with external dimensions of 113mm x 67mm x 46mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Look at the Leica C-Lux versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the C-Lux vs the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the C-Lux and XZ-2 iHS is 85 and 85 respectively.
Leica C-Lux vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading specs. The graphic here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the C-Lux and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, both of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The C-Lux using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Leica C-Lux will deliver more detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern C-Lux is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Leica C-Lux vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica C-Lux vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Leica C-Lux | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica C-Lux | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2018-06-10 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 116.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 2.7 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,240 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,330 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 340 grams (0.75 lb) | 346 grams (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 67 x 46mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 photos | 340 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $1,050 | $450 |