Clicky

Leica CL vs Olympus E-300

Portability
82
Imaging
69
Features
58
Overall
64
Leica CL front
 
Olympus E-300 front
Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37

Leica CL vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs

Leica CL
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 50000
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Leica L Mount
  • 403g - 131 x 78 x 45mm
  • Released November 2017
Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Leica CL vs Olympus E-300 Overview

Its time to look much closer at the Leica CL vs Olympus E-300, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Leica and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the CL (24MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the CL (APS-C) and E-300 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The CL was revealed 13 years after the E-300 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Leica CL being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the CL matches up vs the E-300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica CL over the Olympus E-300

 CL E-300 
ReleasedNovember 2017January 2005More modern by 157 months
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution1040k134kClearer display (+906k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Leica CL

 E-300 CL 
Manual focus Very precise focus

Common features in the Leica CL and Olympus E-300

 CL E-300 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Leica CL vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Leica CL has got outer dimensions of 131mm x 78mm x 45mm (5.2" x 3.1" x 1.8") along with a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Olympus E-300 has measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") and a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).

Check the Leica CL vs Olympus E-300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the CL against the E-300.

Leica CL vs Olympus E-300 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the CL and E-300 is 82 and 67 respectively.

Leica CL vs Olympus E-300 top view buttons comparison

Leica CL vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by checking technical specs. The image underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the CL and E-300.

As you have seen, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The CL having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Leica CL will give extra detail because of its extra 16MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The fresher CL provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Leica CL vs Olympus E-300 sensor size comparison

Leica CL vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica CL vs Olympus E-300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica CL Portrait photography factors
Olympus E-300 Portrait photography factors
73
MP count decent (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
features face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
lack of manual focus
48
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview feature
MP count low (8MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Leica CL as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-300 as a Street photography camera
73
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
offers touch to focus
very good ISO range (50,000)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
51
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
no image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Leica CL Sports photography features
Olympus E-300 Sports photography features
63
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shooting (1/25,000 seconds)
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
does not have image stabilization
terrible battery (220 CIPA)
lack of phase detect AF
37
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect auto focus
no liveview feature
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Leica CL Travel photography details
Olympus E-300 Travel photography details
66
offers touch to focus
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
terrible battery (220 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
45
flash built-in
missing Timelapse recording
MP count low (8MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Leica CL Landscape photography information
Olympus E-300 Landscape photography information
69
change lenses (Leica L mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
MP count decent (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
very good ISO range (50,000)
saves RAW formats
lack of manual focus
does not have image stabilization
terrible battery (220 CIPA)
43
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (1.8")
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
missing Timelapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Leica CL Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
33
touchscreen functionality
features face detection focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have external mic port
9
lack of video recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Leica CL vs Olympus E-300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica CL and Olympus E-300
 Leica CLOlympus E-300
General Information
Make Leica Olympus
Model type Leica CL Olympus E-300
Also referred to as - EVOLT E-300
Class Advanced Mirrorless Advanced DSLR
Released 2017-11-21 2005-01-10
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Chip Maestro II -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.7mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 8 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Highest resolution 6014 x 4014 3264 x 2448
Highest native ISO 50000 400
Highest boosted ISO - 1600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 49 3
Lens
Lens mount type Leica L Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 30 45
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 1.8 inches
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 134 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/25000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance no built-in flash -
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM -
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 None
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 403 gr (0.89 lbs) 624 gr (1.38 lbs)
Dimensions 131 x 78 x 45mm (5.2" x 3.1" x 1.8") 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID BP-DC12 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) Compact Flash (Type I or II)
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $3,799 $800