Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Nikon D7500
82 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58
60 Imaging
66 Features
92 Overall
76
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Nikon D7500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 405g - 118 x 66 x 55mm
- Released September 2014
- Alternate Name is Typ 109
(Full Review)
- 21MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Expand to 1640000)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 720g - 136 x 104 x 73mm
- Announced April 2017
- Replaced the Nikon D7200
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Nikon D7500 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Nikon D7500, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Leica and Nikon. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the D-Lux Typ 109 (13MP) and D7500 (21MP) and the D-Lux Typ 109 (Four Thirds) and D7500 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsAppThe D-Lux Typ 109 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the D7500 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Nikon D7500 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the D-Lux Typ 109 matches up against the D7500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Nikon D7500 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Nikon D7500. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Gallery and Nikon D7500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-Lux Typ 109 over the Nikon D7500
D-Lux Typ 109 | D7500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon D7500 over the Leica D-Lux Typ 109
D7500 | D-Lux Typ 109 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2017 | September 2014 | Fresher by 31 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 921k | Crisper display (+1k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Nikon D7500
D-Lux Typ 109 | D7500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Nikon D7500 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Leica D-Lux Typ 109 has got outside measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") along with a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) whilst the Nikon D7500 has measurements of 136mm x 104mm x 73mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 2.9") and a weight of 720 grams (1.59 lbs).
Analyze the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Nikon D7500 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the D-Lux Typ 109 vs the D7500.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the D-Lux Typ 109 and D7500 is 82 and 60 respectively.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Nikon D7500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specifications. The photograph here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the D-Lux Typ 109 and D7500.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The D-Lux Typ 109 because of its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Nikon D7500 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The older D-Lux Typ 109 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Nikon D7500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Nikon D7500 Specifications
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Nikon D7500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Nikon |
Model type | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Nikon D7500 |
Alternative name | Typ 109 | - |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2014-09-23 | 2017-04-12 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Expeed 5 |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 21MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4112 x 3088 | 5568 x 3712 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 1640000 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 51 |
Cross type focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Nikon F |
Lens zoom range | 24-75mm (3.1x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/1.7-2.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 309 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
Screen resolution | 921k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,760k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | 0.63x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, Rear curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 144 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes (Hot-shoe, Wireless plus sync connector) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 405 grams (0.89 lb) | 720 grams (1.59 lb) |
Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") | 136 x 104 x 73mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 86 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1483 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 950 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | EN-EL15a |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $1,095 | $1,247 |