Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II
82 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 405g - 118 x 66 x 55mm
- Released September 2014
- Additionally referred to as Typ 109
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus E-M10 II, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the D-Lux Typ 109 (13MP) and the E-M10 II (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe D-Lux Typ 109 was brought out 11 months prior to the E-M10 II and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the D-Lux Typ 109 scores against the E-M10 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-Lux Typ 109 over the Olympus E-M10 II
D-Lux Typ 109 | E-M10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Leica D-Lux Typ 109
E-M10 II | D-Lux Typ 109 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | September 2014 | Newer by 11 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 921k | Sharper screen (+119k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus E-M10 II
D-Lux Typ 109 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica D-Lux Typ 109 features exterior measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") and a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 II has measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
See the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus E-M10 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the D-Lux Typ 109 and the E-M10 II.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the D-Lux Typ 109 and E-M10 II is 82 and 82 respectively.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing a spec sheet. The image here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the D-Lux Typ 109 and E-M10 II.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus E-M10 II to provide you with greater detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged D-Lux Typ 109 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Also Known as | Typ 109 | - |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-09-23 | 2015-08-25 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4112 x 3088 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-75mm (3.1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.7-2.8 | - |
Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 921k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,760k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 405g (0.89 lbs) | 390g (0.86 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | 320 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,095 | $499 |