Clicky

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II

Portability
82
Imaging
51
Features
70
Overall
58
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs

Leica D-Lux Typ 109
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
  • 405g - 118 x 66 x 55mm
  • Released September 2014
  • Additionally referred to as Typ 109
Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Announced August 2015
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M10
  • Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview

Lets take a more detailed look at the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus E-M10 II, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the D-Lux Typ 109 (13MP) and the E-M10 II (16MP) is pretty close and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The D-Lux Typ 109 was brought out 11 months prior to the E-M10 II and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the D-Lux Typ 109 scores against the E-M10 II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica D-Lux Typ 109 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 D-Lux Typ 109 E-M10 II 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Leica D-Lux Typ 109

 E-M10 II D-Lux Typ 109 
AnnouncedAugust 2015September 2014Newer by 11 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k921kSharper screen (+119k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus E-M10 II

 D-Lux Typ 109 E-M10 II 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison

If you're intending to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Leica D-Lux Typ 109 features exterior measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") and a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 II has measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).

See the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus E-M10 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the D-Lux Typ 109 and the E-M10 II.

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the D-Lux Typ 109 and E-M10 II is 82 and 82 respectively.

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing a spec sheet. The image here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the D-Lux Typ 109 and E-M10 II.

Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus E-M10 II to provide you with greater detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged D-Lux Typ 109 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Portrait photography information
Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography information
70
focusing manually
good resolution (13MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detection focusing
exports RAW files
72
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
exports RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-M10 II as a Street photography camera
75
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
good ISO range (25,600)
no articulating screen
83
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
supports touch to focus
above average high ISO (25,600)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-M10 II as a Sports photography camera
65
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (13MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect AF
67
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
doesn't have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Travel photography advice
Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography advice
73
good resolution (13 megapixels)
relatively wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.7)
display isn't selfie friendly
73
supports touch to focus
good megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
display isn't selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-M10 II as a Landscape photography camera
73
focusing manually
relatively wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.7)
good sized screen (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (13MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
79
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Leica D-Lux Typ 109
Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 II
35
relatively wide (24mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.7)
image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone jack
35
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
no external mic socket
Photography Glossary

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus E-M10 II
 Leica D-Lux Typ 109Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
General Information
Brand Name Leica Olympus
Model Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
Also Known as Typ 109 -
Class Large Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2014-09-23 2015-08-25
Physical type Large Sensor Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 13 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4112 x 3088 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 25600
Minimum native ISO 200 200
RAW images
Minimum boosted ISO 100 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 49 81
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 24-75mm (3.1x) -
Largest aperture f/1.7-2.8 -
Macro focus range 3cm -
Amount of lenses - 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 921k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,760k dots 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.7x 0.62x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 11.0 frames/s 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) 5.80 m (ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4 H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 405g (0.89 lbs) 390g (0.86 lbs)
Physical dimensions 118 x 66 x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.5
DXO Low light score not tested 842
Other
Battery life 300 photos 320 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $1,095 $499