Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M5
82 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 405g - 118 x 66 x 55mm
- Introduced September 2014
- Also Known as Typ 109
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Launched April 2012
- Replacement is Olympus E-M5 II
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M5 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M5, one is a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. The image resolution of the D-Lux Typ 109 (13MP) and the E-M5 (16MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI LegislationThe D-Lux Typ 109 was unveiled 2 years after the E-M5 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the D-Lux Typ 109 grades vs the E-M5 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus OM-D E-M5. The full galleries are available at Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Gallery and Olympus E-M5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-Lux Typ 109 over the Olympus E-M5
D-Lux Typ 109 | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | April 2012 | More modern by 30 months | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 610k | Crisper screen (+311k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Leica D-Lux Typ 109
E-M5 | D-Lux Typ 109 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus E-M5
D-Lux Typ 109 | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M5 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Leica D-Lux Typ 109 offers outer dimensions of 118mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Olympus E-M5 has specifications of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs).
Examine the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M5 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the D-Lux Typ 109 and the E-M5.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the D-Lux Typ 109 and E-M5 is 82 and 81 respectively.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by going through a spec sheet. The pic below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the D-Lux Typ 109 and E-M5.
As you can see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Olympus E-M5 to show extra detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The newer D-Lux Typ 109 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-M5 Specifications
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 |
Also referred to as | Typ 109 | - |
Class | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2014-09-23 | 2012-04-30 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4112 x 3088 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-75mm (3.1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.7-2.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 921 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,760 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | 0.58x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 405 grams (0.89 lb) | 425 grams (0.94 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 118 x 66 x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 71 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 826 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 360 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $1,095 | $799 |