Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-PL3
82 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-75mm (F1.7-2.8) lens
- 405g - 118 x 66 x 55mm
- Launched September 2014
- Other Name is Typ 109
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Launched September 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL2
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 versus Olympus E-PL3, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the D-Lux Typ 109 (13MP) and the E-PL3 (12MP) is relatively similar and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe D-Lux Typ 109 was unveiled 3 years after the E-PL3 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the D-Lux Typ 109 scores versus the E-PL3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-PL3 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica D-Lux Typ 109 & Olympus PEN E-PL3. The full galleries are provided at Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Gallery & Olympus E-PL3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica D-Lux Typ 109 over the Olympus E-PL3
| D-Lux Typ 109 | E-PL3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | September 2011 | Newer by 37 months |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Leica D-Lux Typ 109
| E-PL3 | D-Lux Typ 109 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 and Olympus E-PL3
| D-Lux Typ 109 | E-PL3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Leica D-Lux Typ 109 provides physical measurements of 118mm x 66mm x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 405 grams (0.89 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL3 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).
See the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 versus Olympus E-PL3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the D-Lux Typ 109 compared to the E-PL3.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the D-Lux Typ 109 and E-PL3 is 82 and 88 respectively.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions only by going over specs. The image underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the D-Lux Typ 109 and E-PL3.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can count on the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 to offer you more detail having an extra 1MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer D-Lux Typ 109 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications
| Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Leica | Olympus |
| Model | Leica D-Lux Typ 109 | Olympus PEN E-PL3 |
| Alternative name | Typ 109 | - |
| Type | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2014-09-23 | 2011-09-20 |
| Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Truepic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4112 x 3088 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 49 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
| Lens focal range | 24-75mm (3.1x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/1.7-2.8 | - |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 107 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 921k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,760k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 405 gr (0.89 pounds) | 313 gr (0.69 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 118 x 66 x 55mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 2.2") | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 52 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 499 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | 300 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $1,095 | $399 |
