Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-420

Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Olympus E-420 front
Portability
77
Imaging
45
Features
36
Overall
41

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-420 Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Released September 2012
Olympus E-420
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed June 2008
  • Superseded the Olympus E-410
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-420 Overview

Its time to look more in depth at the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-420, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and E-420 (10MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and E-420 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The M-E Typ 220 was unveiled 4 years after the E-420 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Leica M-E Typ 220 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the M-E Typ 220 grades versus the E-420 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus E-420

 M-E Typ 220 E-420 
RevealedSeptember 2012June 2008More modern by 52 months

Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 E-420 M-E Typ 220 
Screen dimensions2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-420

 M-E Typ 220 E-420 
Focus manually Very precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-420 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Leica M-E Typ 220 enjoys exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus E-420 has specifications of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).

Compare the Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-420 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the M-E Typ 220 vs the E-420.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-420 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and E-420 is 79 and 77 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-420 top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-420 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes simply by going through a spec sheet. The image below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-E Typ 220 and E-420.

Clearly, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The M-E Typ 220 using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will produce extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent M-E Typ 220 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-420 sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-420 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-420 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Portrait photography with Olympus E-420
71
you can focus manually
good resolution (18 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
doesn't have liveview
57
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low MP (10MP)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Leica M-E Typ 220
Street photography with Olympus E-420
65
big sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
64
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than others in class (426 grams)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Sports photography features
Olympus E-420 Sports photography features
46
good resolution (18MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
doesn't have liveview
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
lack of phase detect autofocus
39
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect AF
max fps very slow (4.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10 megapixels)
bad battery (500 CIPA)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Travel photography details
Olympus E-420 Travel photography details
57
good resolution (18 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
53
lighter than others in class (426 grams)
flash built-in
no Timelapse mode
bad battery (500 shots)
low MP (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Landscape photography details
Olympus E-420 Landscape photography details
61
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Leica M mount)
good resolution (18MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
small screen (2.5")
doesn't have liveview
no image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
47
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.7")
lack of image stabilization
low MP (10MP)
bad battery (500 CIPA)
no Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Leica M-E Typ 220
Vlogging with Olympus E-420
9
no video recording
9
no video recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus E-420 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus E-420
 Leica M-E Typ 220Olympus E-420
General Information
Company Leica Olympus
Model type Leica M-E Typ 220 Olympus E-420
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2012-09-17 2008-06-23
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 18 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Highest resolution 5212 x 3472 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 2500 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 3
Lens
Lens support Leica M Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 59 45
Crop factor 1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x 0.46x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 2.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180s 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Highest video resolution None None
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 585 gr (1.29 lbs) 426 gr (0.94 lbs)
Physical dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 69 56
DXO Color Depth rating 22.7 21.5
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.7 10.4
DXO Low light rating 787 527
Other
Battery life - 500 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $0 $999