Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
95 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus VH-410, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the VH-410 (16MP) is fairly similar but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and VH-410 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M-E Typ 220 was introduced very close to the VH-410 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Leica M-E Typ 220 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a quick summary of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up vs the VH-410 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus VH-410. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery and Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus VH-410
M-E Typ 220 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
VH-410 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus VH-410
M-E Typ 220 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2012 | August 2012 | Similar generation | |
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has outer measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus VH-410 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus VH-410 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the M-E Typ 220 against the VH-410.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and VH-410 is 79 and 95 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The image below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M-E Typ 220 and VH-410.
All in all, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M-E Typ 220 using its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will offer you more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus VH-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Olympus VH-410 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2012-08-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lb) | 152 grams (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 69 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 787 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $0 | $186 |