Clicky

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410

Portability
79
Imaging
65
Features
28
Overall
50
Leica M-E Typ 220 front
 
Olympus VH-410 front
Portability
95
Imaging
40
Features
34
Overall
37

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs

Leica M-E Typ 220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2500
  • No Video
  • Leica M Mount
  • 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
  • Released September 2012
Olympus VH-410
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed August 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus VH-410, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Leica and Olympus. The resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the VH-410 (16MP) is fairly similar but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and VH-410 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The M-E Typ 220 was introduced very close to the VH-410 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Leica M-E Typ 220 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera.

Before going through a complete comparison, below is a quick summary of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up vs the VH-410 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Olympus VH-410

 M-E Typ 220 VH-410 
Focus manually More accurate focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Leica M-E Typ 220

 VH-410 M-E Typ 220 
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus VH-410

 M-E Typ 220 VH-410 
RevealedSeptember 2012August 2012Similar generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Leica M-E Typ 220 has outer measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus VH-410 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Olympus VH-410 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the M-E Typ 220 against the VH-410.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and VH-410 is 79 and 95 respectively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 top view buttons comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The image below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M-E Typ 220 and VH-410.

All in all, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M-E Typ 220 using its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will offer you more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively.

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 sensor size comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus VH-410 Portrait photography highlights
71
you can focus manually
good megapixels (18 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW files
no liveview
35
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
provides face detection focusing
no manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Street photography factors
Olympus VH-410 Street photography factors
65
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports touch focus
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VH-410 as a Sports photography camera
46
good megapixels (18MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
no liveview
max frames per second low (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
41
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Travel photography highlights
Olympus VH-410 Travel photography highlights
57
good megapixels (18 megapixels)
no Timelapse mode
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
68
supports touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
no Timelapse recording
does not contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Landscape photography features
Olympus VH-410 Landscape photography features
61
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Leica M mount)
good megapixels (18MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse mode
43
reasonably wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual exposure
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Timelapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M-E Typ 220 Vlogging information
Olympus VH-410 Vlogging information
9
no video
33
reasonably wide (26mm)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone port
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Olympus VH-410
 Leica M-E Typ 220Olympus VH-410
General Information
Company Leica Olympus
Model Leica M-E Typ 220 Olympus VH-410
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2012-09-17 2012-08-21
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Full frame 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 36 x 24mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 18 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 5212 x 3472 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 2500 1600
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mount Leica M fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Number of lenses 59 -
Crop factor 1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT color LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (rangefinder) None
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 2.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 4.70 m
Flash settings Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 585 grams (1.29 lb) 152 grams (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 69 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 11.7 not tested
DXO Low light score 787 not tested
Other
Battery model - LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at release $0 $186