Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax K100D S
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
65 Imaging
45 Features
38 Overall
42
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax K100D S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 129 x 91 x 71mm
- Released June 2007
- Older Model is Pentax K100D
- Refreshed by Pentax K200D
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax K100D S Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Pentax K100D S, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Leica and Pentax. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and K100D S (6MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and K100D S (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI LegislationThe M-E Typ 220 was revealed 5 years later than the K100D S and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Leica M-E Typ 220 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K100D S being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up against the K100D S when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax K100D S Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Pentax K100D Super. The full galleries are available at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Pentax K100D S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Pentax K100D S
M-E Typ 220 | K100D S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2012 | June 2007 | Fresher by 64 months | |
Display resolution | 230k | 210k | Sharper display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K100D S over the Leica M-E Typ 220
K100D S | M-E Typ 220 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Pentax K100D S
M-E Typ 220 | K100D S | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 2.5" | 2.5" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax K100D S Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Leica M-E Typ 220 provides outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") and a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) while the Pentax K100D S has measurements of 129mm x 91mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
Examine the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Pentax K100D S in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the M-E Typ 220 versus the K100D S.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the M-E Typ 220 and K100D S is 79 and 65 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax K100D S Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The visual underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-E Typ 220 and K100D S.
To sum up, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M-E Typ 220 using its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will give you greater detail because of its extra 12MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more recent M-E Typ 220 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax K100D S Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Pentax K100D S Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Pentax K100D Super | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Pentax |
Model type | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Pentax K100D Super |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2007-06-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 3008 x 2008 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | Pentax KAF2 |
Total lenses | 59 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Highest video resolution | None | None |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 585 grams (1.29 lb) | 646 grams (1.42 lb) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 129 x 91 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 69 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 787 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $0 | $520 |