Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Leica and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M-E Typ 220 was announced 2 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the M-E Typ 220 matches up vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M-E Typ 220 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The whole galleries are provided at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
M-E Typ 220 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2012 | March 2010 | Fresher by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Leica M-E Typ 220
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
M-E Typ 220 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Leica M-E Typ 220 comes with physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the M-E Typ 220 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M-E Typ 220 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 79 and 85 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-E Typ 220 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M-E Typ 220 using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Leica M-E Typ 220 will give you greater detail with its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The more modern M-E Typ 220 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Ricoh |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-09-17 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585g (1.29 lbs) | 355g (0.78 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 69 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 787 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $0 | $349 |