Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony RX100 VA
79 Imaging
65 Features
28 Overall
50
89 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony RX100 VA Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 299g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Revealed July 2018
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony RX100 VA Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Sony RX100 VA, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Leica and Sony. The resolution of the M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the RX100 VA (20MP) is pretty close but the M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) and RX100 VA (1") use totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe M-E Typ 220 was launched 6 years prior to the RX100 VA and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Leica M-E Typ 220 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX100 VA being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the M-E Typ 220 grades versus the RX100 VA for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony RX100 VA Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A). The complete galleries are provided at Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery and Sony RX100 VA Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Sony RX100 VA
M-E Typ 220 | RX100 VA |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX100 VA over the Leica M-E Typ 220
RX100 VA | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2018 | September 2012 | More recent by 70 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Clearer screen (+999k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Leica M-E Typ 220 and Sony RX100 VA
M-E Typ 220 | RX100 VA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony RX100 VA Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Leica M-E Typ 220 offers outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) whilst the Sony RX100 VA has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") with a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs).
Compare the Leica M-E Typ 220 versus Sony RX100 VA in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the M-E Typ 220 versus the RX100 VA.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the M-E Typ 220 and RX100 VA is 79 and 89 respectively.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony RX100 VA Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The graphic underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-E Typ 220 and RX100 VA.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M-E Typ 220 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony RX100 VA will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older M-E Typ 220 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony RX100 VA Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-E Typ 220 vs Sony RX100 VA Specifications
Leica M-E Typ 220 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Sony |
Model | Leica M-E Typ 220 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V(A) |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2018-07-13 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 24.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Rear Sync, Flash Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | NP-BX1 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 585 grams (1.29 pounds) | 299 grams (0.66 pounds) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 69 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 787 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $0 | $998 |