Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-400
74 Imaging
71 Features
47 Overall
61
77 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Later Model is Olympus E-410
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-400 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Leica M Edition 60 and Olympus E-400, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Leica and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the M Edition 60 (24MP) and E-400 (10MP) and the M Edition 60 (Full frame) and E-400 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe M Edition 60 was launched 8 years after the E-400 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Leica M Edition 60 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the M Edition 60 grades vs the E-400 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-400 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M Edition 60 and Olympus E-400. The complete galleries are available at Leica M Edition 60 Gallery and Olympus E-400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Edition 60 over the Olympus E-400
M Edition 60 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2014 | September 2006 | Newer by 98 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 215k | Clearer screen (+705k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Leica M Edition 60
E-400 | M Edition 60 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Edition 60 and Olympus E-400
M Edition 60 | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-400 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Leica M Edition 60 enjoys physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Olympus E-400 has dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") along with a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Check the Leica M Edition 60 and Olympus E-400 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the M Edition 60 versus the E-400.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M Edition 60 and E-400 is 74 and 77 respectively.
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-400 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking a spec sheet. The pic below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the M Edition 60 and E-400.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M Edition 60 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica M Edition 60 will give extra detail utilizing its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent M Edition 60 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus E-400 Specifications
Leica M Edition 60 | Olympus E-400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M Edition 60 | Olympus E-400 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2014-09-23 | 2006-09-14 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 59 | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 920k dot | 215k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 680 gr (1.50 lb) | 435 gr (0.96 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | - | $599 |