Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus Tough-3000
74 Imaging
71 Features
47 Overall
61
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Leica M Edition 60 and Olympus Tough-3000, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Leica and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the M Edition 60 (24MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the M Edition 60 (Full frame) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe M Edition 60 was introduced 4 years after the Tough-3000 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Leica M Edition 60 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the M Edition 60 matches up vs the Tough-3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Edition 60 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica M Edition 60 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Edition 60 over the Olympus Tough-3000
M Edition 60 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2014 | January 2010 | Newer by 58 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Leica M Edition 60
Tough-3000 | M Edition 60 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Edition 60 and Olympus Tough-3000
M Edition 60 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch display | No Touch display |
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Leica M Edition 60 features physical measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has specifications of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Leica M Edition 60 and Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the M Edition 60 compared to the Tough-3000.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the M Edition 60 and Tough-3000 is 74 and 94 respectively.
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the M Edition 60 and Tough-3000.
As you can tell, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The M Edition 60 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Leica M Edition 60 will offer you more detail using its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The younger M Edition 60 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Edition 60 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Leica M Edition 60 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M Edition 60 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also called as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2014-09-23 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 2cm |
Number of lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 680 gr (1.50 lbs) | 159 gr (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | - | $0 |